Back Belts Do Little to Reduce
Injury Claims
If
you've ever walked through a department or grocery store while employees were
stocking shelves or moving supplies, you've probably witnessed a back belt in
action. Many employers recommend or require back belts to reduce employee
injuries and injury claims.
But
are back belts effective? Not according to a study in the December 6, 2000
issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. In the largest
study of its kind, incidence rates of workers' compensation claims and six-month incidence rates of self-reported low
back pain
were gathered from 13,873 employees at 160 retail merchandise stores in 30
states. Eighty-nine stores required back belt use; 71 had a voluntary
back-belt policy. All employees were interviewed at the study's inception and
again at a two-year follow-up.
Results
showed that neither frequent back belt use nor a store policy requiring such
use had any significant effect on back injury
claim rates or self-reported back pain. Accounting for multiple risk factors,
such as lifting frequency and/or a history of previous back injury, did not
substantially alter these findings.
In
1998, a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics survey revealed that Americans
suffered nearly 300,000 back injuries due to overexertion, and resulting in
lost workdays. As this study shows, back belts probably aren't the answer to
this growing problem. Fortunately, there are other options, including sound
advice and care from an expert in dealing with back pain: your local doctor
of chiropractic.
For more information on back pain, go to http://www.chiroweb.com/tyh/backpain.html. To find a chiropractor
near you, go to http://www.chiroweb.com/cgi-bin/locator.
Reference:
Wassell
JT, Gardner LI, Landsittel DP, et al. A prospective study on back belts for
prevention of back pain and injury. Journal of the American Medical Association,
Dec. 6, 2000: Vol. 284, No. 21, pp2727-32.